Zum Hauptinhalt springen Zur Suche springen Zur Hauptnavigation springen
Beschreibung

Dogmatics constitutes the characteristic mode of communication in German(-language) legal scholarship in general and in constitutional law scholarship in particular. Its strength lies in its focus on the needs of legal practice. Yet this practical orientation comes at a price, as it more or less inevitably leads to the exclusion, reduction, or neglect of non-dogmatic approaches to understanding the law. Against this background, the question arises whether legal scholarship in general and constitutional law scholarship in particular possess - and require - additional disciplinary "languages" beyond the classical foundational disciplines of legal history, legal philosophy, and legal sociology in order to communicate beyond the sphere of legal application and to adequately grasp the legal world more broadly.


Particular attention should be paid here to constitutional theory, which, while clearly connected to (constitutional) dogmatics, cannot be reduced to it but instead points beyond it. In this way, constitutional theory could serve as a mediator between dogmatics and the classical foundational disciplines. The French example likewise helps to illuminate both the strengths of the "language model" of German(-language) constitutional law scholarship and its need for supplementation.

Dogmatics constitutes the characteristic mode of communication in German(-language) legal scholarship in general and in constitutional law scholarship in particular. Its strength lies in its focus on the needs of legal practice. Yet this practical orientation comes at a price, as it more or less inevitably leads to the exclusion, reduction, or neglect of non-dogmatic approaches to understanding the law. Against this background, the question arises whether legal scholarship in general and constitutional law scholarship in particular possess - and require - additional disciplinary "languages" beyond the classical foundational disciplines of legal history, legal philosophy, and legal sociology in order to communicate beyond the sphere of legal application and to adequately grasp the legal world more broadly.


Particular attention should be paid here to constitutional theory, which, while clearly connected to (constitutional) dogmatics, cannot be reduced to it but instead points beyond it. In this way, constitutional theory could serve as a mediator between dogmatics and the classical foundational disciplines. The French example likewise helps to illuminate both the strengths of the "language model" of German(-language) constitutional law scholarship and its need for supplementation.

Über den Autor
was 2021-26 Junior Professor of Public Law and the Law of Politics at Leipzig University and is since 2026 Professor of Public Law at the Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg.
Inhaltsverzeichnis

Fabian Michl:
Die Sprachen der Staatsrechtslehre - jenseits der Dogmatik -
Andreas Voßkuhle:
Kommentar zu Fabian Michl, Die Sprachen der Staatsrechtlehre - jenseits der Dogmatik -
Aurore Gaillet:
Kommentar zu Fabian Michl, Die Sprachen der Staatsrechtlehre - jenseits der Dogmatik

Details
Erscheinungsjahr: 2026
Fachbereich: Öffentliches Recht
Genre: Recht, Sozialwissenschaften, Wirtschaft
Produktart: Nachschlagewerke
Rubrik: Recht & Wirtschaft
Medium: Taschenbuch
Inhalt: 94 S.
ISBN-13: 9783162007810
ISBN-10: 316200781X
Sprache: Deutsch
Originalsprache: Deutsch
Herstellernummer: 28491
Einband: Kartoniert / Broschiert
Autor: Michl, Fabian
Kommentar: Voßkuhle, Andreas
Gaillet, Aurore
Auflage: 1. Auflage
Hersteller: Mohr Siebeck GmbH & Co. K
Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Jana Trispel, Wilhelmstr. 18, D-72074 Tübingen, trispel@mohrsiebeck.com
Maße: 178 x 112 x 10 mm
Von/Mit: Fabian Michl
Erscheinungsdatum: 21.07.2026
Gewicht: 0,102 kg
Artikel-ID: 136123744

Ähnliche Produkte