Paul H. Robinson: Criminal Law Conversations

Cover: 9780199861279 | Criminal Law Conversations | Paul H. Robinson (u. a.) | Taschenbuch

Dekorationsartikel gehören nicht zum Leistungsumfang.

Sprache: Englisch

93,35 €

inkl. MwSt.

Versandkostenfrei per Post / DHL

Lieferzeit 1-2 Wochen

Kategorien:

Beschreibung

Criminal Law Conversations provides an authoritative overview of contemporary criminal law debates in the United States. This collection of high caliber scholarly papers was assembled using an innovative and interactive method of nominations and commentary by the nation's top legal scholars. Virtually every leading scholar in the field has participated, resulting in a volume of interest to those both in andoutside of the community. Criminal Law Conversations showcases the most captivating of these essays, and provides insight into the most fundamental and provocative questions of modern criminal law.

Über den Autor

Paul H. Robinson is Professor of Law at the University of Pennsylvania School of Law and most recently the author of Distributive Principles of Criminal Law (OUP, 2008).

Stephen Garvey is Professor of Law at Cornell University School of Law.

Kimberly Kessler Ferzan is Professor of Law at Rutgers University School of Law, Camden.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

i. Principles

Chapter 1. Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in Criminal Law

Meir Dan-Cohen

Comments:

Kyron Huigens-Duress Is Never a Conduct Rule

Samuel W. Buell-Decision Rule as Notice: The Case of Fraud

Anne M. Coughlin-Of Decision Rules and Conduct Rules, or Doing the Police in Different Voices

Luís Duarte d'Almeida-Separation, But Not of Rules

Adil Ahmad Haque-The Constitutive Function of Criminal Law

Eric J. Miller-Are There Two Types of Decision Rule?

Malcolm Thorburn-A Liberal Criminal Law Cannot Be Reduced to These Two Types of Rules

Reply:

Meir Dan-Cohen

Chapter 2. Empirical Desert

Paul H. Robinson

Comments:

Mary Sigler-The False Promise of Empirical Desert

Adam J. Kolber-Compliance-Promoting Intuitions

Michael T. Cahill-A Fertile Desert?

Alice Ristroph-The New Desert

Youngjae Lee-Keeping Desert Honest

Matthew Lister-Desert: Empirical, Not Metaphysical

Alice Ristroph-Response to Lee and Lister

Joseph E. Kennedy-Empirical Desert and the Endpoints of Punishment

Andrew E. Taslitz-Empirical Desert: The Yin and Yang of Criminal Justice

Adil Ahmad Haque-Legitimacy as Strategy

Laura I. Appleman-Sentencing, Empirical Desert, and Restorative Justice

Reply:

Paul H. Robinson

Chapter 3. Defending Preventive Detention

Christopher Slobogin

Comments:

Michael Louis Corrado-Slobogin on Dehumanization

Michael Marcus-Don't Abandon Sentencing Reform to Defend Preventive Detention

Rinat Kitai-Sangero-The Presumption of Innocence versus Preventive Detention

Matt Matravers-Unreliability, Innocence, and Preventive Detention

Joseph E. Kennedy-The Dangers of Dangerousness as a Basis of Incarceration

Reply:

Christopher Slobogin

Chapter 4. The Economics of Crime Control

Doron Teichman

Comments:

Russell D. Covey-The Limits of the Economic Model: Becker's Crime and Punishment

Alon Harel-The Economic Analysis of Crime Control: A Friendly Critique

Keith N. Hylton-Effi cient Deterrence and Crime Control

Morris B. Hoffman-Law, Economics, and Neuroethical Realism

Reply:

Doron Teichman

Chapter 5. The Difficulties of Deterrence as a Distributive Principle

Paul H. Robinson

Comments:

Russell D. Covey-Deterrence's Complexity

Douglas A. Berman-Making Deterrence Work Better

Doron Teichman-In Defense of Deterrence

Jonathan S. Masur, Richard H. McAdams, and Thomas J. Miles-For General Deterrence

Reply:

Paul H. Robinson

Chapter 6. Why only the State may Inflict Criminal Sanctions: The Case Against Privately Inflicted Sanctions

Alon Harel

Comments:

Miriam Baer-Eliminating the Divide Between the State and Its Citizens

Doron Teichman-Why the State May Delegate the Infliction of Criminal Sanctions

Malcolm Thorburn-Why Only the State May Decide when Sanctions Are Appropriate

Stuart P. Green-Why Do Privately Inflicted Criminal Sanctions Matter?

Reply:

Alon Harel

Chapter 7. Results Don't Matter

Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan

Comments:

Gerald Leonard-Some Reasons Why Criminal Harms Matter

Peter Westen-Why Criminal Harms Matter

Thomas Morawetz-Results Don't Matter, But . . .

Jeremy Horder-On the Reducibility of Crimes

Reply:

Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan

Chapter 8. Post-Modern Meditations on Punishment: On the Limits of Reason and the Virtue of Randomization Bernard E. Harcourt

Comments:

Alice Ristroph-Games Punishers Play

Michael M. O'Hear-Chance's Domain

Alon Harel-The Lure of Ambivalent Skepticism

Ken Levy-Punishment Must Be Justified Or Not at All

Reply:

Bernard E. Harcourt

Chapter 9. Remorse, Apology, and Mercy

Jeffrie G. Murphy

Comments:

Sherry F. Colb-Retaining Remorse

Stephanos Bibas-Invasions of Conscience and Faked Apologies

Susan Bandes-Evaluation of Remorse Is Here to Stay: We Should Focus on Improving Its Dynamics

Lisa Kern Griffin-Insincere and Involuntary Public Apologies

Janet Ainsworth-The Social Meaning of Apology

Reply:

Jeffrie G. Murphy

Chapter 10. Interpretive Construction in the Substantive Criminal Law

Mark Kelman

Comments:

Paul Litton-Unexplained, False Assumptions Underlie Kelman's Skepticism

John Mikhail-Unconscious Choices in Legal Analysis

Margaret Raymond-Interpretive Constructions and the Exercise of Bias

Alice Ristroph-Interpretive Construction and Defensive Punishment Theory

Reply:

Mark Kelman

Chapter 11. Criminalization and Sharing Wrongs

S.E. Marshall and R.A. Duff

Comments:

Stuart P. Green-Sharing Wrongs Between Criminal and Civil Sanctions

Shlomit Wallerstein-Victim, Beware! On the Dangers of Sharing Wrongs with Society

Adil Ahmad Haque-Sharing the Burdens of Justice

Matthew Lister-Contractualism and the Sharing of Wrongs

Michelle Madden Dempsey-Sharing Reasons for Criminalization? No Thanks . . . Already Got 'Em!

Andrew E. Taslitz-Public versus Private Retribution and Delegated Revenge

Reply:

S.E. Marshall and R.A. Duff

Chapter 12. Monstrous Offenders and the Search for Solidarity Through Modern Punishment

Joseph E. Kennedy

Comments:

Marianne Wesson-Domesticated Monsters

Janet Ainsworth- "We Have Met the Enemy and He Is Us ": Cognitive Bias and Perceptions of Threats

Douglas A. Berman-Have Good Intentions Also Fueled the Severity Revolution?

Reply:

Joseph E. Kennedy

ii. Doctrine

Chapter 13. Against Negligence Liability

Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan

Comments:

Leo Zaibert-For Negligence Liability

Michelle Madden Dempsey-The Object of Criminal Responsibility

Alan Brudner-Is Negligence Blameless?

Stephen P. Garvey-Fatally Circular? Not!

Andrew E. Taslitz-Cognitive Science and Contextual Negligence Liability

Kenneth W. Simons-The Distinction Between Negligence and Recklessness Is Unstable

Reply:

Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan

Chapter 14. Rape Law Reform Based on Negotiation: Beyond the No and Yes Models

Michelle J. Anderson

Comments:

Andrew E. Taslitz-Self-Deception and Rape Law Reform

Kimberly Kessler Ferzan-Sex as Contract

Robin Charlow-Negotiating Sex: Would It Work?

Sherry F. Colb-Conversation Before Penetration?

Marianne Wesson-You Can't Get Away from Consent

Reply:

Michelle J. Anderson

Chapter 15. Provocation: Explaining and Justifying the Defense in Partial Excuse, Loss of Self-Control Terms

Joshua Dressler

Comments:

Susan D. Rozelle-He Had It Coming: Provocation as a Partial Justification

Vera Bergelson-Provocation: Not Just a Partial Excuse

Marcia Baron-Reframing the Issues: Differing Views of Justification and the Feminist Critique of Provocation

Joan H. Krause-Tolerating the Loss of Self-Control

Kenneth Simons-Excuse Doctrine Should Eschew Both the Reasonable and the Ordinary Person

Stephen P. Garvey-Get Rid of Adequate Provocation!

Marianne Wesson-Enforcing Virtue with the Law of Homicide

Reply:

Joshua Dressler

Chapter 16. Objective Versus Subjective Justifi cation: A Case Study in Function and Form in Constructing a System of Criminal Law Theory

Paul H. Robinson

Comments:

Peter Westen-A Platonic Justification for "Unknowing Justification "

Shlomit Wallerstein-The Third, Combined, Theory for Justifications

Mitchell N. Berman-In Defense of Subjective Justifications

John Mikhail-Constraining the Necessity Defense

Reply:

Paul H. Robinson 361

Chapter 17. Self-Defense and the Psychotic Aggressor

George P. Fletcher and Luis E. Chiesa

Comments:

Boaz Sangero- "Self-Defense and the Psychotic Aggressor ": What About Proportionality?

John Mikhail-Self-Defense Against Wrongful Attack: The Case of the Psychotic Aggressor

Sherry F. Colb-Justifying Homicide Against Innocent Aggressors Without Denying Their Innocence

Shlomit Wallerstein-Two Flaws in the Autonomy-Based Justification for Self-Defense

Whitley R.P. Kaufman-Problems for the Autonomy Theory of Self-Defense

Reply:

George P. Fletcher and Luis E. Chiesa

Chapter 18. Self-Defense Against Morally Innocent Threats

Jeff McMahan

Comments:

Adil Ahmad Haque-Rights and Liabilities at War

Shlomit Wallerstein-Why Causal Responsibility Matters

Kimberly Kessler Ferzan-Can't Sue; Can't...

Details

Erscheinungsjahr:	2011
Fachbereich:	Strafrecht
Genre:	Importe , Recht
Produktart:	Nachschlagewerke
Rubrik:	Recht & Wirtschaft
Medium:	Taschenbuch
Inhalt:	Kartoniert / Broschiert
ISBN-13:	9780199861279
ISBN-10:	0199861277
Sprache:	Englisch
Einband:	Kartoniert / Broschiert
Autor:	Robinson, Paul H. Garvey, Stephen P. Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler
Redaktion:	Robinson, Paul H. Garvey, Stephen Kessler Ferzan, Kimberly
Hersteller:	Oxford University Press
Verantwortliche Person für die EU:	Libri GmbH, Europaallee 1, D-36244 Bad Hersfeld, gpsr@libri.de
Maße:	234 x 156 x 41 mm
Von/Mit:	Paul H. Robinson (u. a.)
Erscheinungsdatum:	17.11.2011
Gewicht:	1,135 kg