35,95 €*
Versandkostenfrei per Post / DHL
auf Lager, Lieferzeit 1-2 Werktage
With the Treaty of Lisbon, which entered into force on 1 December 2009, the EU de facto became a state territory stretching from Portugal to Finland and from Ireland to Cyprus. The European Parliament became an equal-status decision-maker alongside the Council of the European Union (Council). The previous co-decision procedure was elevated to become the standard procedure ("ordinary legislative procedure"). The so-called qualified majority (55 percent of the EU member states which simultaneously represent at least 65 percent of the EU population) was introduced for all important areas in the Council. As a result, the outcome of decision-making processes has become largely incalculable for the actors on the "European Union stage" - the EU member states, EU regions, companies, associations and organisations.
The second edition includes a new chapter, in which Prof. Klemens Joos makes the variables of successful interest representation even more tangible on the basis of his scientific formula: at the latest since the Treaty of Lisbon, the basic prerequisite for successful interest representation in the EU involves the continuous and close intermeshing of the affected party's content competence (of the four "classic instruments" of interest representation: corporate representative offices, associations, public affairs agencies, law firms) with process structure competence (i.e. the EU-wide maintenance of the required spatial, personnel and organisational capacities as well as strong networks across institutions, political groups and member states) on the part of an independent intermediary. The likelihood of success can be increased exponentially if success is achieved, firstly, in committing to the concern of an affected party through a change of perspective such that the positive effects on the common good are shifted into the foreground for the decision-makers in the EU (perspective change competence) and, secondly, in successfully integrating the concern into the crucial decision-making processes at the political level and continuously supporting it (process support competence).
Guest authors:
This work includes guest contributions from Prof. Christian Blümelhuber (Berlin University of the Arts), Prof. Anton Meyer (formerly LMU Munich), Prof. Armin Nassehi (LMU Munich) and Prof. Franz Waldenberger (Director of the German Institute of Japanese Studies, Tokyo) as well as a foreword by Prof. Gunther Friedl (Dean of the TUM School of Management) and a preface by Prof. Thomas F. Hofmann (President of TU Munich).
With the Treaty of Lisbon, which entered into force on 1 December 2009, the EU de facto became a state territory stretching from Portugal to Finland and from Ireland to Cyprus. The European Parliament became an equal-status decision-maker alongside the Council of the European Union (Council). The previous co-decision procedure was elevated to become the standard procedure ("ordinary legislative procedure"). The so-called qualified majority (55 percent of the EU member states which simultaneously represent at least 65 percent of the EU population) was introduced for all important areas in the Council. As a result, the outcome of decision-making processes has become largely incalculable for the actors on the "European Union stage" - the EU member states, EU regions, companies, associations and organisations.
The second edition includes a new chapter, in which Prof. Klemens Joos makes the variables of successful interest representation even more tangible on the basis of his scientific formula: at the latest since the Treaty of Lisbon, the basic prerequisite for successful interest representation in the EU involves the continuous and close intermeshing of the affected party's content competence (of the four "classic instruments" of interest representation: corporate representative offices, associations, public affairs agencies, law firms) with process structure competence (i.e. the EU-wide maintenance of the required spatial, personnel and organisational capacities as well as strong networks across institutions, political groups and member states) on the part of an independent intermediary. The likelihood of success can be increased exponentially if success is achieved, firstly, in committing to the concern of an affected party through a change of perspective such that the positive effects on the common good are shifted into the foreground for the decision-makers in the EU (perspective change competence) and, secondly, in successfully integrating the concern into the crucial decision-making processes at the political level and continuously supporting it (process support competence).
Guest authors:
This work includes guest contributions from Prof. Christian Blümelhuber (Berlin University of the Arts), Prof. Anton Meyer (formerly LMU Munich), Prof. Armin Nassehi (LMU Munich) and Prof. Franz Waldenberger (Director of the German Institute of Japanese Studies, Tokyo) as well as a foreword by Prof. Gunther Friedl (Dean of the TUM School of Management) and a preface by Prof. Thomas F. Hofmann (President of TU Munich).
Preface 17
Welcome to the second edition 19
Foreword to the second edition 21
Introduction 23
1 Set down in a formula: successful representation of interests in complex decision-making processes 31
1.1 Ways out of the complexity trap of political decision-making structures 31
1.1.1 Problem-solving in complex situations: process trumps content 31
1.1.2 Stakeholder versus shareholder approach 32
1.1.3 Decisions without decision-makers: complex multi-level system of the European Union (EU) 33
1.2 Political rebirth of the EU 33
1.2.1 Treaty of Lisbon as the background to a paradigm shift 33
1.2.2 Reorganisation of decision-making processes due to the Treaty of Lisbon 34
1.2.3 Effects on interest representation from the changed framework conditions of the Treaty of Lisbon 35
1.3 Successful representation of interests in the complex EU decision-making system 36
1.3.1 Formula for success 36
1.3.2 Example of applying the formula for success - the "mountain example" 37
1.3.2.1 Pre-Lisbon: successes for content-oriented interest representation 40
1.3.2.2 Post-Lisbon: process barriers to content-oriented interest representation 40
1.3.2.3 Overcoming the process barrier through process-oriented interest representation 43
1.3.2.4 Elements of process competence 45
1.3.2.5 Importance of process structure competence (PStC) 45
1.3.2.6 Importance of perspective change competence (PCC) 47
1.3.2.7 Importance of process support competence (PSuC) 53
1.4 Conclusion 55
2 Fundamental thoughts on the topic of interest representation and stakeholders 57
2.1 Differences of interest, stakeholders and translation conflicts 57
2.1.1 Complexity and differentiation 58
2.1.2 One theory of the "stakeholder" 64
2.1.3 Translation conflicts 65
2.2 Stakeholder orientation: perspectives of corporate management beyond the classic shareholder value approach in the face of more complex framework conditions 66
2.2.1 "Be ahead of change": challenge of stakeholder orientation 66
2.2.2 Drivers of stakeholder orientation 67
2.2.2.1 Internet and digitisation 67
2.2.2.2 Climate change and demographic trend 69
2.2.2.3 Critical trends and globalisation and in a fully networked economic and financial world 70
2.2.2.4 New organisational structures for the representation of civil interests 71
2.2.2.5 Interim result 72
2.2.3 Ideal of the honourable merchant: a stakeholder-oriented concept? 73
2.2.4 Complex and dynamic perspectives of stakeholder orientation 74
2.2.5 Stakeholder theory: central contributions, development stages and selected key findings 76
2.2.5.1 Central contributions to the stakeholder theory 76
2.2.5.2 Three stakeholder theory development stages 77
2.2.5.3 Maturity phase as part of stake holder management 83
2.2.6 Stakeholder management and strategies 89
2.2.7 Example applications of the stakeholder view in marketing 95
2.2.8 Summary and outlook 99
2.2.9 Closing remarks 100
2.3 Importance of the intermediary in interest representation derived from mutual market relationship theories 101
2.3.1 Intermediaries 101
2.3.1.1 Definitions 101
2.3.1.2 Intermediaries explained using economic theories 103
2.3.1.2.1 Transaction cost theory 104
2.3.1.2.2 Search theory 106
2.3.1.2.3 Intermediation theory of the firm 107
2.3.1.2.4 Principal agent theory 108
2.3.1.3 Behavioural theories 110
2.3.1.3.1 Structural hole theory 110
2.3.1.3.2 Social exchange theory 111
2.3.2 Summary 112
3 Representation of interests: an approach. Fundamentals and introduction 115
3.1 Introduction 115
3.2 The representation of interests as a structured communication process 116
3.2.1 Question and definition 116
3.2.2 Concepts of interest representation: from investor relations to governmental relations 119
3.2.3 Representation of interests as an indispensable element of corporate communication 123
3.2.3.1 Representation of interests as an early warning system: identification of issues and trends 123
3.2.3.2 The representation of interests as a long-term project: structural support of decision-making processes 127
3.2.3.2.1 General 127
3.2.3.2.2 Information management 128
3.2.3.2.3 Strategy consulting 129
3.2.3.2.4 Events 130
3.2.3.2.5 Integration of corporate interests 131
3.2.3.3 The representation of interests as political crisis management: interest representation as "fire-fighting" 131
3.3 Legitimation of interest representation 134
3.3.1 Politics as the contest between various interests with the objective of consensual solutions 137
3.3.2 Interest representation as the aggregation of interests 140
3.3.3 Interest representation as a tool for forming communication interfaces between politics and the affected parties: necessity of an intermediary 142
3.3.4 Political science concepts for analysing and evaluating interest representation: overview 146
3.3.4.1 Neo-pluralism 146
3.3.4.2 Neo-corporatism 148
3.3.4.3 Exchange theory 150
3.3.4.4 Governance approach 152
3.3.5 Fundamentals of European law 154
3.3.5.1 Primary legal fundamentals 155
3.3.5.2 Regulations for lobbyists (code of conduct) and European Union officials 155
3.3.5.2.1 Regulations for lobbyists 156
3.3.5.2.2 Regulations for European Union officials 157
3.3.5.3 Further legal regulations and voluntary commitment of lobbyists 159
3.4 Summary 160
4 Politics as a process: paradigm shift from content competence to process competence in interest representation 165
4.1 Introduction and question 165
4.2 Content as the key element of politics? 167
4.3 Classic dimensions of politics: polity, policy, politics 170
4.4 Procedural dimension of politics 173
4.4.1 "Complexity trap" of polity: process competence for the political system in the European Union 173
4.4.2 Policy cycle 174
4.4.2.1 Problem definition 176
4.4.2.2 Agenda setting 177
4.4.2.3 Policy formulation and decision 178
4.4.2.4 Policy implementation 179
4.4.2.5 Policy evaluation 180
4.4.2.6 Policy termination 181
4.5 Temporal dimension of politics 182
4.5.1 Endogenous time slots 183
4.5.2 Exogenous time slots 184
4.5.3 Structural time slots 185
4.6 Political actors 186
4.6.1 Individual actors 188
4.6.2 Collective and corporate actors 190
4.6.3 Institutional actors 191
4.7 Political networks 194
4.8 Laws of (political) decisions 198
4.8.1 Homo economicus or homo politicus? 199
4.8.2 Decision-making by homo politicus 203
4.9 Summary 211
5 European Union as the target of interest representation: political system and peculiarities in comparison with member state systems 217
5.1 Introduction and question 217
5.2 Short history of European integration 218
5.3 Fundamental changes due to the Treaty of Lisbon 226
5.3.1 "Lisbon": Treaty or Constitution? 227
5.3.1.1 Genesis of the Treaty of Lisbon 228
5.3.1.1.1 Context: genesis of the Constitutional Treaty and constitutional crisis 228
5.3.1.1.2 Way out of the constitutional crisis 230
5.3.1.2 How the chosen process determined the substance of the Treaty of Lisbon 232
5.3.1.2.1 Base camp and game of chess 233
5.3.1.2.2 Berlin Declaration and Sherpa consultations: informal processes as the way to success 234
5.3.1.2.3 A negotiating mandate without freedom to negotiate 236
5.3.1.2.4 Conclusion 238
5.3.1.3 Evaluation of the differences between the Constitutional Treaty and the Treaty of Lisbon 238
5.3.2 Strengthening the EU externally: the EU as a global player 241
5.3.3 Strengthening the EU internally: transition from the principle of unanimity to the majority principle in the Council of the EU is becoming the usual case 245
5.3.4 Strengthening of the European Parliament 248
5.4 Integration theories and the multi-level system of the European Union 249
5.4.1 Federalism 250
5.4.1.1 Federalism as a political objective 251
5.4.1.2 Federalism as a political science integration theory 251
5.4.2 Neo-functionalism 252
5.4.3 Liberal intergovernmentalism 255
5.4.4 Supranationalism 257
5.4.5 Multi-level governance 258
5.4.6 Conclusion 263
5.5 Political stakeholders in the European Union 263
[...]opean (supranational) level: overview of the institutions of the European Union 264
[...]opean Parliament 264
[...]opean Council 269
5.5.1.3 Council of the European Union (Council of Ministers) 269
[...]opean Commission 272
5.5.1.5 Court of Justice of the European Union 276
[...]opean Central Bank 276
[...]opean Court of Auditors 277
5.5.1.8 Other institutions 278
[...]opean Economic and Social Committee 278
5.5.1.8.2 Committee of the Regions 280
5.5.2 Member state (national) level 280
5.5.2.1 Member state ("permanent") representations 282
5.5.2.2 Regional representations 283
5.5.3 Civil society (non-state) level 286
5.5.3.1 Associations 288
5.5.3.2 Organisations and public interest groups 289
5.5.3.3 Media 291
5.6 Summary 293
6 Legislative procedure and other legal regulations as the framework of interest representation in the European Union 297
6.1 Introduction and question 297
6.2 Bases of...
| Erscheinungsjahr: | 2023 |
|---|---|
| Genre: | Politikwissenschaften |
| Rubrik: | Wissenschaften |
| Medium: | Buch |
| Inhalt: | 592 S. |
| ISBN-13: | 9783527511389 |
| ISBN-10: | 3527511385 |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Herstellernummer: | 1151138 000 |
| Einband: | Gebunden |
| Autor: | Joos, Klemens |
| Auflage: | 2. überarb. und ergänzte Auflage |
| Hersteller: | Wiley-VCH GmbH |
| Maße: | 248 x 176 x 49 mm |
| Von/Mit: | Klemens Joos |
| Erscheinungsdatum: | 06.09.2023 |
| Gewicht: | 1,146 kg |
Preface 17
Welcome to the second edition 19
Foreword to the second edition 21
Introduction 23
1 Set down in a formula: successful representation of interests in complex decision-making processes 31
1.1 Ways out of the complexity trap of political decision-making structures 31
1.1.1 Problem-solving in complex situations: process trumps content 31
1.1.2 Stakeholder versus shareholder approach 32
1.1.3 Decisions without decision-makers: complex multi-level system of the European Union (EU) 33
1.2 Political rebirth of the EU 33
1.2.1 Treaty of Lisbon as the background to a paradigm shift 33
1.2.2 Reorganisation of decision-making processes due to the Treaty of Lisbon 34
1.2.3 Effects on interest representation from the changed framework conditions of the Treaty of Lisbon 35
1.3 Successful representation of interests in the complex EU decision-making system 36
1.3.1 Formula for success 36
1.3.2 Example of applying the formula for success - the "mountain example" 37
1.3.2.1 Pre-Lisbon: successes for content-oriented interest representation 40
1.3.2.2 Post-Lisbon: process barriers to content-oriented interest representation 40
1.3.2.3 Overcoming the process barrier through process-oriented interest representation 43
1.3.2.4 Elements of process competence 45
1.3.2.5 Importance of process structure competence (PStC) 45
1.3.2.6 Importance of perspective change competence (PCC) 47
1.3.2.7 Importance of process support competence (PSuC) 53
1.4 Conclusion 55
2 Fundamental thoughts on the topic of interest representation and stakeholders 57
2.1 Differences of interest, stakeholders and translation conflicts 57
2.1.1 Complexity and differentiation 58
2.1.2 One theory of the "stakeholder" 64
2.1.3 Translation conflicts 65
2.2 Stakeholder orientation: perspectives of corporate management beyond the classic shareholder value approach in the face of more complex framework conditions 66
2.2.1 "Be ahead of change": challenge of stakeholder orientation 66
2.2.2 Drivers of stakeholder orientation 67
2.2.2.1 Internet and digitisation 67
2.2.2.2 Climate change and demographic trend 69
2.2.2.3 Critical trends and globalisation and in a fully networked economic and financial world 70
2.2.2.4 New organisational structures for the representation of civil interests 71
2.2.2.5 Interim result 72
2.2.3 Ideal of the honourable merchant: a stakeholder-oriented concept? 73
2.2.4 Complex and dynamic perspectives of stakeholder orientation 74
2.2.5 Stakeholder theory: central contributions, development stages and selected key findings 76
2.2.5.1 Central contributions to the stakeholder theory 76
2.2.5.2 Three stakeholder theory development stages 77
2.2.5.3 Maturity phase as part of stake holder management 83
2.2.6 Stakeholder management and strategies 89
2.2.7 Example applications of the stakeholder view in marketing 95
2.2.8 Summary and outlook 99
2.2.9 Closing remarks 100
2.3 Importance of the intermediary in interest representation derived from mutual market relationship theories 101
2.3.1 Intermediaries 101
2.3.1.1 Definitions 101
2.3.1.2 Intermediaries explained using economic theories 103
2.3.1.2.1 Transaction cost theory 104
2.3.1.2.2 Search theory 106
2.3.1.2.3 Intermediation theory of the firm 107
2.3.1.2.4 Principal agent theory 108
2.3.1.3 Behavioural theories 110
2.3.1.3.1 Structural hole theory 110
2.3.1.3.2 Social exchange theory 111
2.3.2 Summary 112
3 Representation of interests: an approach. Fundamentals and introduction 115
3.1 Introduction 115
3.2 The representation of interests as a structured communication process 116
3.2.1 Question and definition 116
3.2.2 Concepts of interest representation: from investor relations to governmental relations 119
3.2.3 Representation of interests as an indispensable element of corporate communication 123
3.2.3.1 Representation of interests as an early warning system: identification of issues and trends 123
3.2.3.2 The representation of interests as a long-term project: structural support of decision-making processes 127
3.2.3.2.1 General 127
3.2.3.2.2 Information management 128
3.2.3.2.3 Strategy consulting 129
3.2.3.2.4 Events 130
3.2.3.2.5 Integration of corporate interests 131
3.2.3.3 The representation of interests as political crisis management: interest representation as "fire-fighting" 131
3.3 Legitimation of interest representation 134
3.3.1 Politics as the contest between various interests with the objective of consensual solutions 137
3.3.2 Interest representation as the aggregation of interests 140
3.3.3 Interest representation as a tool for forming communication interfaces between politics and the affected parties: necessity of an intermediary 142
3.3.4 Political science concepts for analysing and evaluating interest representation: overview 146
3.3.4.1 Neo-pluralism 146
3.3.4.2 Neo-corporatism 148
3.3.4.3 Exchange theory 150
3.3.4.4 Governance approach 152
3.3.5 Fundamentals of European law 154
3.3.5.1 Primary legal fundamentals 155
3.3.5.2 Regulations for lobbyists (code of conduct) and European Union officials 155
3.3.5.2.1 Regulations for lobbyists 156
3.3.5.2.2 Regulations for European Union officials 157
3.3.5.3 Further legal regulations and voluntary commitment of lobbyists 159
3.4 Summary 160
4 Politics as a process: paradigm shift from content competence to process competence in interest representation 165
4.1 Introduction and question 165
4.2 Content as the key element of politics? 167
4.3 Classic dimensions of politics: polity, policy, politics 170
4.4 Procedural dimension of politics 173
4.4.1 "Complexity trap" of polity: process competence for the political system in the European Union 173
4.4.2 Policy cycle 174
4.4.2.1 Problem definition 176
4.4.2.2 Agenda setting 177
4.4.2.3 Policy formulation and decision 178
4.4.2.4 Policy implementation 179
4.4.2.5 Policy evaluation 180
4.4.2.6 Policy termination 181
4.5 Temporal dimension of politics 182
4.5.1 Endogenous time slots 183
4.5.2 Exogenous time slots 184
4.5.3 Structural time slots 185
4.6 Political actors 186
4.6.1 Individual actors 188
4.6.2 Collective and corporate actors 190
4.6.3 Institutional actors 191
4.7 Political networks 194
4.8 Laws of (political) decisions 198
4.8.1 Homo economicus or homo politicus? 199
4.8.2 Decision-making by homo politicus 203
4.9 Summary 211
5 European Union as the target of interest representation: political system and peculiarities in comparison with member state systems 217
5.1 Introduction and question 217
5.2 Short history of European integration 218
5.3 Fundamental changes due to the Treaty of Lisbon 226
5.3.1 "Lisbon": Treaty or Constitution? 227
5.3.1.1 Genesis of the Treaty of Lisbon 228
5.3.1.1.1 Context: genesis of the Constitutional Treaty and constitutional crisis 228
5.3.1.1.2 Way out of the constitutional crisis 230
5.3.1.2 How the chosen process determined the substance of the Treaty of Lisbon 232
5.3.1.2.1 Base camp and game of chess 233
5.3.1.2.2 Berlin Declaration and Sherpa consultations: informal processes as the way to success 234
5.3.1.2.3 A negotiating mandate without freedom to negotiate 236
5.3.1.2.4 Conclusion 238
5.3.1.3 Evaluation of the differences between the Constitutional Treaty and the Treaty of Lisbon 238
5.3.2 Strengthening the EU externally: the EU as a global player 241
5.3.3 Strengthening the EU internally: transition from the principle of unanimity to the majority principle in the Council of the EU is becoming the usual case 245
5.3.4 Strengthening of the European Parliament 248
5.4 Integration theories and the multi-level system of the European Union 249
5.4.1 Federalism 250
5.4.1.1 Federalism as a political objective 251
5.4.1.2 Federalism as a political science integration theory 251
5.4.2 Neo-functionalism 252
5.4.3 Liberal intergovernmentalism 255
5.4.4 Supranationalism 257
5.4.5 Multi-level governance 258
5.4.6 Conclusion 263
5.5 Political stakeholders in the European Union 263
[...]opean (supranational) level: overview of the institutions of the European Union 264
[...]opean Parliament 264
[...]opean Council 269
5.5.1.3 Council of the European Union (Council of Ministers) 269
[...]opean Commission 272
5.5.1.5 Court of Justice of the European Union 276
[...]opean Central Bank 276
[...]opean Court of Auditors 277
5.5.1.8 Other institutions 278
[...]opean Economic and Social Committee 278
5.5.1.8.2 Committee of the Regions 280
5.5.2 Member state (national) level 280
5.5.2.1 Member state ("permanent") representations 282
5.5.2.2 Regional representations 283
5.5.3 Civil society (non-state) level 286
5.5.3.1 Associations 288
5.5.3.2 Organisations and public interest groups 289
5.5.3.3 Media 291
5.6 Summary 293
6 Legislative procedure and other legal regulations as the framework of interest representation in the European Union 297
6.1 Introduction and question 297
6.2 Bases of...
| Erscheinungsjahr: | 2023 |
|---|---|
| Genre: | Politikwissenschaften |
| Rubrik: | Wissenschaften |
| Medium: | Buch |
| Inhalt: | 592 S. |
| ISBN-13: | 9783527511389 |
| ISBN-10: | 3527511385 |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Herstellernummer: | 1151138 000 |
| Einband: | Gebunden |
| Autor: | Joos, Klemens |
| Auflage: | 2. überarb. und ergänzte Auflage |
| Hersteller: | Wiley-VCH GmbH |
| Maße: | 248 x 176 x 49 mm |
| Von/Mit: | Klemens Joos |
| Erscheinungsdatum: | 06.09.2023 |
| Gewicht: | 1,146 kg |
Ähnliche Produkte
Lieferzeit 1-2 Werktage
Lieferzeit 1-2 Wochen
Lieferzeit 1-2 Werktage
Lieferzeit 1-2 Wochen
Lieferzeit 1-2 Werktage
Aktuell nicht verfügbar
Lieferzeit 1-2 Werktage
