Dekorationsartikel gehören nicht zum Leistungsumfang.
Sprache:
Englisch
90,00 €*
Versandkostenfrei per Post / DHL
auf Lager, Lieferzeit 1-2 Werktage
Kategorien:
Beschreibung
The Book
The Urheberrechts-Diensteanbieter-Gesetz (UrhDaG) is the German implementation of the controversial Art. 17 Directive 2019/790 (Copyright in the Digital Single Market, DSDM). Germany has decided against a minimum effort implementation and resisted the temptation to just incorporate the wording of the Directive more or less literally into the German Copyright Act (UrhG). Instead, it has opted for a comprehensive implementation in a stand-alone act, including:
As Art. 17 DSDM has been implemented very heterogeneously in the Member States, further decisions of the CJEU are to be expected. The detailed German implementation might serve as a reference and source of inspiration for the further specification of Art. 17 DSDM.
The commentary aims to meet the expectations both of German and foreign lawyers interested in platform regulation and copyright by providing a detailed explanation both of the German implementation and, by that, of Art. 17 DSMD.
The Advantages at a Glance
The Target Group
For German and foreign Copyright lawyers.
The Urheberrechts-Diensteanbieter-Gesetz (UrhDaG) is the German implementation of the controversial Art. 17 Directive 2019/790 (Copyright in the Digital Single Market, DSDM). Germany has decided against a minimum effort implementation and resisted the temptation to just incorporate the wording of the Directive more or less literally into the German Copyright Act (UrhG). Instead, it has opted for a comprehensive implementation in a stand-alone act, including:
- an extensive definition of an OCSSP with a safe-harbour clause for excluded service providers
- a detailed provision specifying the obligation to acquire contractual rights of use
- several provisions on direct remuneration for authors, performers and photographers
- very detailed provisions balancing between the obligation to preventively block copyright infringing material and the users' rights to freedom of expression and information which more or less anticipated (and likely influenced) the CJEU's decision Poland/Parliament and Council, including a section on uses presumably authorised by law
- a redress system consisting of complaints procedures and an alternative dispute resolution mechanism
- detailed obligations for measures against abuse
- rights of information for rightholders and for the purpose of scientific research
As Art. 17 DSDM has been implemented very heterogeneously in the Member States, further decisions of the CJEU are to be expected. The detailed German implementation might serve as a reference and source of inspiration for the further specification of Art. 17 DSDM.
The commentary aims to meet the expectations both of German and foreign lawyers interested in platform regulation and copyright by providing a detailed explanation both of the German implementation and, by that, of Art. 17 DSMD.
The Advantages at a Glance
- Article-by-Article Commentary
- in English language
- clearly and uniformly structured analysis of each provision
The Target Group
For German and foreign Copyright lawyers.
The Book
The Urheberrechts-Diensteanbieter-Gesetz (UrhDaG) is the German implementation of the controversial Art. 17 Directive 2019/790 (Copyright in the Digital Single Market, DSDM). Germany has decided against a minimum effort implementation and resisted the temptation to just incorporate the wording of the Directive more or less literally into the German Copyright Act (UrhG). Instead, it has opted for a comprehensive implementation in a stand-alone act, including:
As Art. 17 DSDM has been implemented very heterogeneously in the Member States, further decisions of the CJEU are to be expected. The detailed German implementation might serve as a reference and source of inspiration for the further specification of Art. 17 DSDM.
The commentary aims to meet the expectations both of German and foreign lawyers interested in platform regulation and copyright by providing a detailed explanation both of the German implementation and, by that, of Art. 17 DSMD.
The Advantages at a Glance
The Target Group
For German and foreign Copyright lawyers.
The Urheberrechts-Diensteanbieter-Gesetz (UrhDaG) is the German implementation of the controversial Art. 17 Directive 2019/790 (Copyright in the Digital Single Market, DSDM). Germany has decided against a minimum effort implementation and resisted the temptation to just incorporate the wording of the Directive more or less literally into the German Copyright Act (UrhG). Instead, it has opted for a comprehensive implementation in a stand-alone act, including:
- an extensive definition of an OCSSP with a safe-harbour clause for excluded service providers
- a detailed provision specifying the obligation to acquire contractual rights of use
- several provisions on direct remuneration for authors, performers and photographers
- very detailed provisions balancing between the obligation to preventively block copyright infringing material and the users' rights to freedom of expression and information which more or less anticipated (and likely influenced) the CJEU's decision Poland/Parliament and Council, including a section on uses presumably authorised by law
- a redress system consisting of complaints procedures and an alternative dispute resolution mechanism
- detailed obligations for measures against abuse
- rights of information for rightholders and for the purpose of scientific research
As Art. 17 DSDM has been implemented very heterogeneously in the Member States, further decisions of the CJEU are to be expected. The detailed German implementation might serve as a reference and source of inspiration for the further specification of Art. 17 DSDM.
The commentary aims to meet the expectations both of German and foreign lawyers interested in platform regulation and copyright by providing a detailed explanation both of the German implementation and, by that, of Art. 17 DSMD.
The Advantages at a Glance
- Article-by-Article Commentary
- in English language
- clearly and uniformly structured analysis of each provision
The Target Group
For German and foreign Copyright lawyers.
Inhaltsverzeichnis
The Act on Copyright Content Sharing Service Providers (UrhDaG) is the German transposition of the controversial Art. 17 Directive (EU) 2019/790 (DSMD). Instead of a minimum effort copy-paste implementation into the German Copyright Act (UrhG), the German legislator opted for a comprehensive stand-alone act with extensive provisions on, e.g.
- an OCSSP with a safe-harbour clause for excluded service providers
- the obligation to acquire contractual rights of use
- direct remuneration for authors, performers, and photographers
analysis of the provisions, shows the extensive discussions that accompanied the implementation procedure, and addresses the interplay of the UrhDaG with the UrhG and the respective requirements of the DSMD.
Benjamin Raue is a Professor of Private Law, Digital and IP Law at Trier University.
Louisa Specht-Riemenschneider is a Professor of Private Law, Data Economy Law, Data Protection Law, Law of Digitalisation and AI Law at the University of Bonn.
Louisa Specht-Riemenschneider is a Professor of Private Law, Data Economy Law, Data Protection Law, Law of Digitalisation and AI Law at the University of Bonn.
Details
Erscheinungsjahr: | 2024 |
---|---|
Fachbereich: | Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht, Arbeitsrecht |
Genre: | Recht, Sozialwissenschaften, Wirtschaft |
Produktart: | Nachschlagewerke |
Rubrik: | Recht & Wirtschaft |
Medium: | Taschenbuch |
Inhalt: |
XIV
170 S. |
ISBN-13: | 9783406812361 |
ISBN-10: | 3406812368 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Einband: | Kartoniert / Broschiert |
Autor: |
Raue, Benjamin
Specht-Riemenschneider, Louisa |
Auflage: | 1. Auflage |
Hersteller: |
C.H. Beck
Verlag C.H. Beck oHG |
Maße: | 239 x 160 x 13 mm |
Von/Mit: | Benjamin Raue (u. a.) |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 27.05.2024 |
Gewicht: | 0,368 kg |
Inhaltsverzeichnis
The Act on Copyright Content Sharing Service Providers (UrhDaG) is the German transposition of the controversial Art. 17 Directive (EU) 2019/790 (DSMD). Instead of a minimum effort copy-paste implementation into the German Copyright Act (UrhG), the German legislator opted for a comprehensive stand-alone act with extensive provisions on, e.g.
- an OCSSP with a safe-harbour clause for excluded service providers
- the obligation to acquire contractual rights of use
- direct remuneration for authors, performers, and photographers
analysis of the provisions, shows the extensive discussions that accompanied the implementation procedure, and addresses the interplay of the UrhDaG with the UrhG and the respective requirements of the DSMD.
Benjamin Raue is a Professor of Private Law, Digital and IP Law at Trier University.
Louisa Specht-Riemenschneider is a Professor of Private Law, Data Economy Law, Data Protection Law, Law of Digitalisation and AI Law at the University of Bonn.
Louisa Specht-Riemenschneider is a Professor of Private Law, Data Economy Law, Data Protection Law, Law of Digitalisation and AI Law at the University of Bonn.
Details
Erscheinungsjahr: | 2024 |
---|---|
Fachbereich: | Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht, Arbeitsrecht |
Genre: | Recht, Sozialwissenschaften, Wirtschaft |
Produktart: | Nachschlagewerke |
Rubrik: | Recht & Wirtschaft |
Medium: | Taschenbuch |
Inhalt: |
XIV
170 S. |
ISBN-13: | 9783406812361 |
ISBN-10: | 3406812368 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Einband: | Kartoniert / Broschiert |
Autor: |
Raue, Benjamin
Specht-Riemenschneider, Louisa |
Auflage: | 1. Auflage |
Hersteller: |
C.H. Beck
Verlag C.H. Beck oHG |
Maße: | 239 x 160 x 13 mm |
Von/Mit: | Benjamin Raue (u. a.) |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 27.05.2024 |
Gewicht: | 0,368 kg |
Warnhinweis